T
Good first pedalboard upgrade
Since I've been buying some extra pedals, my former pedaltrain nano+ became a bit small to fit everything.
I was therefore looking for a knew solution, with a bit more space, but no overkill, to end up with a lot of open space on the knew one.
For me the TRES 3.2 seems the correct size for my current needs.
I chose Rockboard over Pedaltrain this time, since it appeared to be easier to hide cables, due to the fact that there are more rows of smaller holes. Especially good, since every pedal has its own positioning of connections.
You can fit two rows of pedals on top of each other, but only if you only own pedals that have "normal" dimensions. (For example, I have a TC Electronics Fangs and these are too big to fit two of this on top of each other).
In depth it could have been a bit longer for me, it would create a bit more space in between two pedals, but the QUAD, comes in with too much extra I think.
With the pedals close to each other, especially if you place a higher model on the first row, you hit it, when switching on a pedal of row two.
BUT it gave me the idea of actually keeping my Nano+ pedal. I fitted this with velcro as a higher second row, like you see with the big, expensive pedalboards. In this way the second row is a bit higher and you can switch the pedals on and off without problem.
I can fit 10 normal sized pedals on the board on the width of the Nano, so this gives mee two rows of 10 normal sized pedals. Next to this there is enough space to fit an expression pedal, since the TRES 3.2 and the Nano have different widths.
Further on, the Rockboard have many possible options, such as the tray, the patch bays, etcetera.
I was therefore looking for a knew solution, with a bit more space, but no overkill, to end up with a lot of open space on the knew one.
For me the TRES 3.2 seems the correct size for my current needs.
I chose Rockboard over Pedaltrain this time, since it appeared to be easier to hide cables, due to the fact that there are more rows of smaller holes. Especially good, since every pedal has its own positioning of connections.
You can fit two rows of pedals on top of each other, but only if you only own pedals that have "normal" dimensions. (For example, I have a TC Electronics Fangs and these are too big to fit two of this on top of each other).
In depth it could have been a bit longer for me, it would create a bit more space in between two pedals, but the QUAD, comes in with too much extra I think.
With the pedals close to each other, especially if you place a higher model on the first row, you hit it, when switching on a pedal of row two.
BUT it gave me the idea of actually keeping my Nano+ pedal. I fitted this with velcro as a higher second row, like you see with the big, expensive pedalboards. In this way the second row is a bit higher and you can switch the pedals on and off without problem.
I can fit 10 normal sized pedals on the board on the width of the Nano, so this gives mee two rows of 10 normal sized pedals. Next to this there is enough space to fit an expression pedal, since the TRES 3.2 and the Nano have different widths.
Further on, the Rockboard have many possible options, such as the tray, the patch bays, etcetera.
0
0
Report
